English | دری

Unfair subcontracting: who pays?

in Afghan Business

Unfair subcontracting: who pays?

By Najib Manalai- Mohamed Said Fellag, an Algerian humorist, displays in one of his shows a young Algerian embraces the Catholic faith to marry his Swiss lover. During the christening ceremony the priest pours water on him and converts him from Muslim to Catholic. Later, his wife asks him to buy some fish for a Friday lunch. The new convert buys a chicken, pours water on it and says: “You came in as a Chicken, you go out as a Fish!”

Fellag’s sketch came to my mind when I read a BBC report, titled: “Afghan ‘fraud’ puts Nato troops at risk, US report warns”. The story goes on:

“Nato forces in Afghanistan have been exposed to greater risk of Taliban attacks because of fraud, a US government agency has alleged.

A report said Afghan contractors paid to seal drainage channels – often used to hide explosives under roads – had failed to do so in more than 100 cases.

A criminal investigation is under way, senior generals have been told.

The BBC’s Andrew North in Kabul says if proven, the case is likely to deepen mistrust between Nato and Afghans.

In a letter released on Thursday, special inspector general for Afghan reconstruction John Sopko warned senior commanders that an Afghan contractor paid to seal drainage systems along strategic roads had left the work undone or badly done.”

For years US and NATO forces granted huge contracts, including construction, infrastructure and even security to firms selected by themselves, under publicly unknown terms, who in turn did the job through a chain of sub-contractors and sub-sub-contractors. The people and the government of Afghanistan raised this issue every then and now with the US and NATO official. Instead of taking these concerns in consideration, the US and NATO tried to impose their choices by all possible means. When, last year, the Afghan government decided to dismantle private security companies the highest resistance came from the NATO and US. In 2010, in the Kabul Conference, it was agreed that the International Community will channel at least 50% of the Aid through National Budget but again, Alliance partners preferred not to keep their promises, pretending that private contractor were far more reliable than the government structures. Roads and buildings constructed under these, at manifolds higher prices than those built by the government are not functional anymore due to lack of quality.

Special inspector general for Afghan reconstruction John Sopko finally finds out that the thieves NATO and US agencies have baptized as reliable partners constitute a real threat to their own security. Will this lesson lead to a change in attitude or, as usual, the Afghans will keep paying for the mistakes?

Related Articles

Yahoo chief bans working from home

Since Marissa Mayer became chief executive of Yahoo, she has been working hard to get the Internet pioneer off its

Afghanistan's major dam project remains under onslaughts

Afghanistan’s major Shah and Aros dam in the Shakardarah District of Kabul province was under heavy rocket shelling for three

Afghanistan publishes its first textbooks for teaching future civil servants

The Afghanistan Civil Service Institute (ACSI) published two new textbooks for teaching Afghanistan’s next generations of civil servants. The books

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. wadsam
    wadsam Author 13 October, 2012, 13:36

    Thank you for the comment. If you’d be willing to send an article to Wadsam, please do not hesitate to do so. Contact info@wadsam.com

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.